Press Alt+1 for screen-reader mode, Alt+0 to cancelAccessibility Screen-Reader Guide, Feedback, and Issue Reporting | New window
Get 20% Off Your First Purchase — Use Code FIRST20 at Checkout

Navigating Stormy Parenting Plans: Process Over Chaos

Presented by Brian Brunkow

(4,902 Ratings)
LexVid

Watch This Course for Free!

New LexVid members can watch their 1st course for free. No credit card needed, just create an account and you'll receive your certificate immediately after watching your free course.

Already a member? Sign in

Course Description

Length: 1h 11min    Published: 9/2/2025    
As lawyers it’s easy to get myopic and wrapped up in the chaos, mechanics and technicalities of dispute resolution. Divorce basically deals with money matters and the parenting plan. For financials, we simply collect income and assets, liabilities and debts. Then we shove the numbers into a magical 3rd party software program and we get what we get. For the Parenting Plan? Not so much. This is more art than science. Maybe the parenting plan terminates after high school graduation. But how the parents handle the residential schedule, decision making, and dispute resolution process will have a significant impact on the entire family for decades to come. Because of this, we want our client focused on “process and controllables”. As ‘ol Ben Franklin said, “If you would persuade, appeal to interest and not to reason.” Same strategy applies today when dealing with parenting plan conflict. Our job is to help uncover the opposing party’s interest and pivot negotiations from positional arguments to focusing on the underlying reasons. Also, our job is to prepare clients to anticipate and better cope with their ex-spouse’s bad behavior. No client can control the ex-spouse, but every client can and should control their own response. This course will inform new lawyers and remind seasoned lawyers how to view the parenting plan from the client’s perspective. Our representation of the client might last 18 months. But for the client the parenting plan is an infinite, life-long game after our job is done. We want to both counsel the client and provide a framework to assist them in their day-to-day interaction (over the coming decades) with the ex. This include interest-based negotiations, impasse and options outside of a fully-agreed to parenting plan, common cognitive bias traps in divorce, and providing a toolbox for thriving…or at least maintaining self control during toxic parenting plan negotiations. Lastly, we negotiate in our professional and personal lives every day. Importantly, while this course is focused on managing “process and controllables” in the parenting plan, the concepts and strategies are fairly universal for general dispute resolution.
Learning Objectives
* Identify the unique challenges of parenting plans compared to financial issues in divorce, and recognize why parenting plan negotiations are more art than science
* Shift client and attorney focus from positional bargaining to uncovering and leveraging underlying interests, using Franklin’s principle of appealing to interest rather than reason
* Equip clients with tools to anticipate and manage an ex-spouse’s difficult behavior, while emphasizing the importance of controlling their own responses
* Understand common cognitive biases that can derail parenting plan negotiations and develop strategies to avoid impasse or create workable options when full agreement isn’t possible
* Counsel clients with a perspective that extends beyond the litigation timeline, providing them with a framework for sustaining healthy interaction and self-control in co-parenting over the decades
Read the course transcript.

Speaker Q&A

Question
Sally claims to be Sam. Mom says she should be allowed to transition. Dad is against transitioning. He doesn’t even want social transiting. How would you handle it as mom’s attorney? As Dad’s?
- MargaretM
Answer
Thanks for the question. This is probably one of those polarizing issues where parent 1 and parent 2 will not be changing anyone's mind on the topic. Because of that, I'd suggest a three-part approach to "keep the peace" as much as possible between the parents and lawyers. First - the client should be coached up on showing respect for the other parent. We want the client willing to do frequent check-ins and ask questions to ensure the client understands the other parent's point of view. Summarize their points and get confirmation from the other parent that the understanding is correct. Understanding and empathy is not agreement. The goal is to create a framework for productive communication. Second - As lawyers we should briefly cover cognitive bias with our clients. For this polarizing issue be aware of "Confirmation Bias" "Bubble/Worldview Bias" and "Self-Serving Bias." Third - Beware the danger of "armchair advisors". These are the well-meaning family members, friends and co-workers who provide opinions and advice without knowing the nuances of a specific client's situation. Again, there is limited hope that parent 1 or parent 2 will change their mind on this topic. We should therefore be investing time and energy into creating a positive framework for respectful discussions.
- Brian Brunkow

Presented By:

Brian Brunkow

Bothell, WA

206.687.3895

brianbrunkow@gmail.com

Featured Reviews