The hour went very fast. One of the more enjoyable ethics credits I have taken.

Love this guy. His examples really make you think and discover your own biases.

No sure why this type of course is a requirement.

Need more juror bias and how to diffuse it.

I liked the speakers candid and interactive teaching style.

This lecture missed the mark for me. I understand that expert witnesses may well have biases. I would be surprised if they didn't. I was hoping to hear suggestions about uncovering bias in judges and jurors -- e.g., studies show that those who subscribe to "Time" magazine probably will look unfavorably on claims being made by non-white litigants, etc -- and, better still, advice on ways to address it. That doesn't seem like too much to ask of a lecture titled "Bias in the Courtroom." Unfortunately, there was little such content.

The subject matter was interesting and the presentation well organized. The course provides a nice starting point in learning how to evaluate expert opinions, reports and testimony.