Press Alt+1 for screen-reader mode, Alt+0 to cancelAccessibility Screen-Reader Guide, Feedback, and Issue Reporting

0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
Read All 21 Reviews
Thank you!!
- Ricardo P
The course was very Anatomy and Treatment oriented. Litigiation was not discussed very much. Perhaps the litigation portion of the title should be removed.
- William H
Excellent presentation. Thank you very much.
- Norman S
Very informative
- Elliot T
Excellent!
- Kevin P
I could have used a little more discussion re: litigating car crashes
- Robert B
Adequate review of typical auto injuries.
- Maurice B
Was expecting more on the litigation side rather than just anatomy of injuries.
- David S
This program had zero law, and was confined to a presentation of endless discussion of particular injuries, their symptomatic expression, and medical treatment and diagnosis.
- Katherine M
I feel like this focused a bit more on anatomy and treatment than litigation.
- Adil S
Very informative. Great slides.
- Ginna K
This was the best program on lex vid. It gave real information and would be helpful for anyone who needs a refresher on car wreck injuries.
- Philip K
The instructor who is both a nurse and an attorney was very knowledgeable and presented everything properly.
- Milene M
Interesting medical material. Slides were too small to see all the detail sometimes though.
- James R
Very good presentation of the medical issues involved in personal injury cases.
- Brian L
Excellent job!
- reginald r
The slides were helpful to understanding of some unfamiliar medical terms/concepts.
- William F
I was hoping for more discussion about litigation, because that word is in the title. It was a good presentation, but it was really more of a medical presentation. That is fine, and, I suppose, useful for personal injury cases. But it was too heavy on medicine and not heavy enough on law. Good presentation, but I was expecting much more discussion about legal issues involving personal injury litigation.
- Justin H
Very good refresher
- John D
excellent analysis of injuries and very good materials for someone familier with this area already; assumes working knowledge of PI cases and is not a primer on that aspect at all.
- Tracey C
very helpful
- eugene l